Paging Willie Sutton

When asked why he robbed banks, the infamous bank robber Willie Sutton famously explained “Because that’s where the money is.”

Maybe Willie should have gone to law school instead.

Why?  Read on.

Once upon a time, Starbucks decided it wanted to be more than the coffee people take to the office and drink awkwardly over first dates; it wanted to be the coffee people drink at home, in an iced variety in their car, and more.  Going retail takes more than a great product, though:  it requires a distribution network, and instead of creating your own network for a limited product line, it makes more sense to hire someone who already has that distribution network to do the distribution and sales for you.

So Starbucks hired Kraft, which helped Starbucks grow a boffo retail business.

At some point, Starbucks decided it wanted to part ways with Kraft, so it filed for divorce.  The tortuous rationale for Starbucks’ decision and Kraft’s counter-arguments read like a season’s worth of episodes of Falcon Crest, and since The Curmudgeon could never follow Falcon Crest and those arguments are not terribly relevant to this particular tale, he will dispense with attempting to recount them.

The point is that a judge recently granted the divorce and established its terms:  Starbucks, which knew from the start it would owe Kraft a great deal of money, must pay Kraft $2.23 billion in damages.

And $527 million for legal fees.

Let that soak in for a moment:  $527 million in legal fees for a dispute that began in November of 2010 and ended three years later.

And now we shall repeat that:  $527 million in legal fees for three years of work.

$527 million – which, by the way, if you’re into breaking down such figures, amounts to more than $480,000 a day for three years, including Sundays and holidays.

What in the world could those lawyers possibly have been doing to justify $527 million in legal bills in just three years?  Are we talking about the law firm made famous by the Marx Brothers?  You know:  Dewey, Cheatum & Howe?

So it turns out Willie Sutton had it all wrong.  If he really wanted to go where the money is, he would have attended law school.

Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Scott, (Friend of Mr. Goldberg)  On November 26, 2013 at 8:30 am

    I happen to have a few close friends that are lawyers, and by no means make that kind of coin…….but in this case, the only reason that law firm charged that ridiculous amount in fees was……because they can. Which reminds me of a quote from Billy Shakespeare……”The first thing we do, is kill all the lawyers.”

    • foureyedcurmudgeon  On November 26, 2013 at 8:34 am

      I realize that, of course. What’s really striking to me in this particular case is not that the lawyers sought such outrageous fees but – that a judge approved them!

  • Brian Caughlan  On November 26, 2013 at 10:57 am

    Dewey, Cheatem… was a Stooges thing. Hungedunga… and McCormick was Groucho. Am I proud that I know this? No, not particularly. Happy Thanksgiving!

    • foureyedcurmudgeon  On November 26, 2013 at 11:05 am

      That’s what The Curmudgeon thought, too, but after some extensive research – okay, reading a Wikipedia entry – he found that the Stooges used Dewey Burnham & Howe and that Dewey Cheatem & Howe has been attributed to the Marx brothers and others (although Wikipedia’s entry lacks a citation). Dang, The Curmudgeon has waaaay too much time on his hands. Happy Thanksgiving to you, too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: