About Keith Olbermann

The Curmudgeon isn’t a Keith Olbermann fan. Although apparently a real pain in the ass to work with, which doesn’t bother The Curmudgeon because he doesn’t anticipate sharing an employer with Olbermann anytime soon, he’s a terrific broadcaster, incredibly forceful and articulate, and probably an excellent writer, because all of those rants of his surely can’t be extemporaneous. When he was on MSNBC, his style was so thoroughly obnoxious that even though The Curmudgeon agrees with him on the vast majority of political issues, he found watching Olbermann no less unpleasant than watching Bill O’Reilly or Sean Hannity.

Olbermann’s at ESPN these days – his second tour of duty there after stints with MSNBC, Fox Sports, NBC sports, the ABC radio network, and something called Current TV. Right now he has a thirty-minute afternoon show five nights a week, a mix consisting of two-thirds of Olbermann pontificating and one-third him interviewing someone from the world of sports or entertainment. The Curmudgeon has never seen Olbermann’s current ESPN show and has no interest in doing so because it’s not the kind of thing that interests him regardless of who’s doing the talking or what they’re talking about.

olbermannA few days ago Olbermann was suspended from his job for the rest of the week because of a Twitter exchange he had with some Penn State students who were bragging about a successful charity event they had just completed. Olbermann belittled the students, belittled the event, belittled the school, and belittled its alumni.

But suspending him doesn’t make sense. ESPN hired Olbermann, an opinionated guy, and put him on television two-and-a-half hours a week to… give his opinions. He’s not a reporter, he’s a commentator. Pretty much all he does on his show, as The Curmudgeon understands it, is sit there and give his opinions. That’s his job; it’s what ESPN hired him to do.

So then why suspend him for giving an opinion? Is he only permitted to express some opinions? The nice opinions? The opinions that don’t offend anyone, or don’t offend many?

The folks at ESPN knew what they were getting when they hired Olbermann, knew he would be inflammatory, and no doubt encourage him to use Twitter to engage with viewers and potential viewers to build the audience both for his show and ESPN in general.

So why suspend him for daring to express a unpopular opinion?

When did we get so damned sensitive that we can’t tolerate opinions that differ from our own and feel the need to punish – severely – those who have them?

Advertisements
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Peaches Shimmerdeep.  On February 28, 2015 at 8:27 am

    I haven’t followed “tweet-gate” but offer some observations, nonetheless. 1. All of this provides Olberman and ESPN more publicity. I didn’t even know he had an ESPN show til now. 2. Tweets and other online comments are often more vociferous than what people actually say– there seems to be a misplaced and ill-advised bravery in the semi-anonymity of the Internet that brings out the worst in people. (Check out Jimmy Kimmel’s Mean Tweets on YouTube to see those who have been maligned face up and take back the power– a favorite of mine.) My point is that perhaps Olberman bloviated in an even more obnoxious way online than on-air. 3. Sometimes, those of us who use words to influence, provoke, and amuse make mistakes in judgment– always have. Twitter and other social media enable us to insert foot in mouth to a wider audience within seconds–a real problem. And 4. Yes, people seem to have lost some of the emotional maturity needed to tolerate, and occasionally, even learn from, a different point of view. Even views I absolutely oppose can be enlightening about an issue and an individual. So- we need to grow up, risk being wrong, and take a stand. Sounds like Olberman did that. Agree or disagree.

    • foureyedcurmudgeon  On February 28, 2015 at 8:55 am

      It’s hard to imagine any way Olbermann’s bloviations could be any more obnoxious than they are when he’s on the air, but I agree. Words can be powerful, and the anonymity of the internet enticing (although he’s clearly not anonymous). It pains me that I can’t put my name on my own blog, but I try pretty hard not to write anything here that I wouldn’t be unwilling to see my name alongside. And yes, I came upon Mean Tweets when it was only up to #3, so I’m familiar with the concept. Years ago I found myself acting too obnoxious, even for me, in the novel environment of an internet chat room, realized it one day – and gave it up cold turkey.

  • Peaches Shimmerdeep  On February 28, 2015 at 6:48 pm

    Bravo!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: