Hey, Sarah Sanders

Did you really go on Fox & Friends on Tuesday and tell the folks there that

The president wants this process to come to a vote because that’s what’s supposed to happen.  In every single one of these instances where someone is nominated, they go before, they have a hearing and then the senators vote on it.

See it for yourself here.

Clueless

Um, Sarah, have you wiped from your memory the name “Merrick Garland”? Mr. Garland, you may recall, was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Obama in March of 2016 and the Republican-controlled Senate refused even to consider his nomination. Judge Garland did not go before the Senate Judiciary Committee, was not the subject of a vote by the entire Senate, and in fact, some of the members of the Judiciary Committee wouldn’t even let him in their office.

So when you tell us that “In every single one of these instances where someone is nominated, they go before, they have a hearing and then the senators vote on it” you either are having a complete memory lapse, are lying through your teeth, or are hopelessly, totally clueless.